Carnivore vs Plant-Based vs Satiety: Which Nutrients are Harder to Get? : General Low-Carb Forum : Active Low-Carber Forums

#1 ^

Tue, Jul-25-23, 04:30

JEY100 JEY100 is offline

To Good Health!

Posts: 13,505

Plan: P:E/DDF
Stats: 225/150/169 Female 5' 9"

BF:45%/28%/25%
Progress: 134%

Location: NC

Carnivore vs Plant-Based vs Satiety: Which Nutrients are Harder to Get?

I was looking for a Carnivore thread, the Zero Carb one in Paleo forum hasn’t had a post since Jan2018. So new thread here.

Marty Kendall wrote a new blog post on Satiety and Nutrient Density for various forms of a Carnivore Diet. Each version of carnivore has its Nutrient density and Satiety score with Protein % in a chart. Interesting to learn about these different levels of food lists.

Carnivore vs Plant-Based vs Satiety: Which Nutrients are Harder to Get?
https://optimisingnutrition.com/car...nts/#more-41751

Quote:

An omnivorous diet allows us to maximise nutrient density and satiety and minimises ultra-processed foods.
The more we narrow our food choices, the less nutritionally complementary foods we have to choose from. If we drop plants and keep seafood and dairy, we can still get a fairly nutritious outcome.
However, nutrient density and satiety decrease as we exclude more foods from our repertoire.
A meat-only diet provides heaps of bioavailable protein, which is the foundation of any healthy diet, but it can be harder to get several essential micronutrients, including vitamin K1, vitamin C, manganese, folate, calcium, vitamin E and omega 3.

DietDoctor has new guides to carnivore.
Sinking our teeth into the carnivore diet: what’s known, what’s not
https://www.dietdoctor.com/low-carb/carnivore
This covers the basics and includes a good list of the websites and podcasts that feature Carnivore.

Last edited by JEY100 : Tue, Jul-25-23 at 05:14.